Food for Thought



“The Gun Is Civilization” By Maj. L. Caudill, USMC (Ret)

“Human beings only have two ways to deal with one another: reason and force. If you want me to do something for you, you have a choice of either convincing me via argument, or force me to do your bidding under threat of force. Every human interaction falls into one of those two categories, without exception. Reason or force, that’s it.

In a truly moral and civilized society, people exclusively interact through persuasion. Force has no place as a valid method of social interaction, and the only thing that removes force from the menu is the personal firearm, as paradoxical as it may sound to some.

When I carry a gun, you cannot deal with me by force. You have to use reason and try to persuade me, because I have a way to negate your threat or employment of force.

The gun is the only personal weapon that puts a 100-pound woman on equal footing with a 220-pound mugger, a 75-year old retiree on equal footing with a 19-year old gang banger, and a single guy on equal footing with a carload of drunk guys with baseball bats. The gun removes the disparity in physical strength, size, or numbers between a potential attacker and a defender.

There are plenty of people who consider the gun as the source of bad force equations. These are the people who think that we’d be more civilized if all guns were removed from society, because a firearm makes it easier for a [armed] mugger to do his job. That, of course, is only true if the mugger’s potential victims are mostly disarmed either by choice or by legislative fiat – it has no validity when most of a mugger’s potential marks are armed.

People who argue for the banning of arms ask for automatic rule by the young, the strong, and the many, and that’s the exact opposite of a civilized society. A mugger, even an armed one, can only make a successful living in a society where the state has granted him a force monopoly. (If his potential victims are armed as well, the mugger will be dead in a week).

Then there’s the argument that the gun makes confrontations lethal that otherwise would only result in injury. This argument is fallacious in several ways. Without guns involved, confrontations are won by the physically superior party inflicting overwhelming injury on the loser.  People who think that fists, bats, sticks, or stones don’t constitute lethal force watch too much TV, where people take beatings and come out of it with a bloody lip at worst. The fact that the gun makes lethal force easier works solely in favor of the weaker defender, not the stronger attacker. If both are armed, the field is level.

The gun is the only weapon that’s as lethal in the hands of an octogenarian as it is in the hands of a weight lifter. It simply wouldn’t work as well as a force equalizer if it wasn’t both lethal and easily employable.

When I carry a gun, I don’t do so because I am looking for a fight, but because I’m looking to be left alone. The gun at my side means that I cannot be forced, only persuaded. I don’t carry it because I’m afraid, but because it enables me to be unafraid. It doesn’t limit the actions of those who would interact with me through reason, only the actions of those who would do so by force. It removes force from the equation… And that’s why carrying a gun is a civilized act.”

By Maj. L. Caudill USMC (Ret.)



Hindsight is 20/20. A survivor ponders how Russians should have fought the state police, that the citizens outnumbered their oppressors, and that compliance led to gulag work camps and death for most.

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family?

Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?…

The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If…if…We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation…. We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”
Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956



Read the following with the understanding that the “international corporate mafia” are the globalists: the tyrant wanna-be’s comprised of corrupt politicians, bureaucrats, multi-national corporation heads and the World Economic Forum.

In the Course of Human Events – by Henry Shivley

We the people of the United States of America, in order to reestablish our authority through our Constitution and insure life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for ourselves and our progeny, must come together as a single people, unwavering in our determination that one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all will not fade into the annuls of history.

Our forefathers sacrificed in ways that we cannot imagine that we might enjoy life free from the restraints of a tyrannical government.  For too many generations now we the people have been passive towards the incremental incursions into our personal liberties.  Furthermore we have endured the international corporate mafia’s theft of our industry and resources.

We must rise in righteous indignation and reassert our right to throw off the tyrant as described in our Declaration of Independence.  As our forefathers did, we must organize into town, city, county, state, and national militia.  When we have become as prepared as our resources will allow, we must deliver an ultimatum to the international corporate mafia demanding that they surrender all they have stolen and leave our shores or face annihilation.

Our forefathers must have trembled at the thought of facing down the most powerful army on the planet.  But history has taught us that desperate people tend to take desperate measures.  And as we find ourselves with our backs against the wall as Americans there is only one thing we can do.  Come out swinging and don’t stop until we know the enemy has been vanquished.

We did not ask for this fight but reality cannot be sidestepped any further.  It’s time.  Fight dirty, get mean.


“But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.” 
Source:  Declaration of Independence



“When all government …in little as in great things… shall be drawn to Washington as the center of all power; it will render powerless the checks provided of one government on another, and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated.” ~ Thomas Jefferson

“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” ~ John Adams

“The right of citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible.” ~ Hubert H. Humphrey

“Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.” ~ Thomas Jefferson

“The house of representatives…can make no law which will not have its full operation on themselves and their friends, as well as the great mass of society. This has always been deemed one of the strongest bonds by which human policy can connect the rulers and the people together. It creates between them that communion of interest, and sympathy of sentiments, of which few governments have furnished examples; but without which every government degenerates into tyranny.”   James Madison: Federalist No. 57, February 19, 1788